|
Post by jakeawesomesnake on Apr 1, 2014 2:41:26 GMT -5
I was able to win once again and with LOB's approval I decided to make this the first ever 2 month competition (partially because I already had about 60 films scouted for it). Anyway the theme for this month is movie covers/posters (whatever you want to call them). I wanted to do this for a few months now ,but I'm not the most technologically savvy and it took me awhile to figure out how to something for this contest. As usual I'll be pretty liberal with the qualifications it could be a movie you like or have seen that you think has a good cover/poster, like a large chunk of my childhood (and many other people's) it can just be a random movie who's cover/poster you think is cool, or a movie you've been meaning to see that happens to have a good poster. Also post an image of the particular poster that attracted you to the movie on here or if that doesn't work than a link showing it will suffice.
1 point for any non-horror film that fits this criteria 2 points for any horror film that fits this criteria
As usual honor system at work and the competition ends on May 31st midnight California time.
I'm really excited for this competition there's a few movies I always wanted to see as a child ,but never did that I'm going to watch and my goal is to have a minimum of 1 movie for each day (61 movies) watched.
Bring it LOB!
|
|
|
Post by jakeawesomesnake on Apr 22, 2014 1:11:34 GMT -5
Spoilers Below: First I watched Chad Crawford Kinkle's 2013 American horror film Jug Face starring Sean Bridgers (that sadistic Will Ferell look alike from The Woman), Sean Young, and Lauren Ashley Carter. It's about a rural Tennessee community who worship and make sacrifices to a supernatural pit, who make's its demands clear through Jug Faces. The acting is good-great, the acts of violence, cinematography, gore, and soundtrack (a combination of rock and bluegrass) are all great. I also thought all the jug faces looked cool. The "shunned) looked good except for the CGI aura around them which didn't. This movie did a good job of really making you hate the community and root for the protagonist (Carter), which tells you how unlikeable the people were given that she has a child with her brother. Sean Young excelled as an incredibly evil unlikeable mother. The only thing I didn't like about the ending, I mean I wanted something more, but at the same time it kind of took me off guard and made me fell bad so maybe it did a good job. Either way this was a really good movie that doesn't really have anything wrong with it, but lacks a little something from making it great. That being said it was the director's first film so I'll be looking forward to his stuff in the future. I was first intrigued by this movie when I was looking for some indie horror lists and saw the film's poster, then the website I found it recommended it and I decided to watch it ,but each time I tried the place I'd found it would have it taken off. Then I heard a glowing recommend of it on Horroretc. and decided that I would definitely watch the thing. Then I watched Robert Altman's 1972 American-British coproduction and horror film Images, which had Vilmos Zsigmond as cinematographer (someone I've come to expect for beyond great cinematography) and John Williams doing the soundtrack. It's about children's book author who begins to experience strange events during a getaway in the country. The acting, acts of violence, soundtrack, gore, and cinematography are all great (seriously the cinematography is fantastic). This movie uses a mainly psychological approach to horror and tries to make you wondering if what is happening is mental, real, or supernatural. It also does a great job of showing you the perspective of an unreliable narrator with one character becoming played by another actor with no warning, which I thought was a cool subtle trick. The antagonists (mainly Marcel) were creepy and menacing, seriously reinforcing the fact that it is a bad idea for women to trust 70's guys in film. This is a great movie and a recommend. I first became interested in this movie while looking for random horror movies to watch on Viooz (which now seems to be working again) by it's cover, then did some spoiler free looking up and found out it was done by Robert Altman (I've enjoyed all the movie's I've seen of his except for Quintet), and as the credits began I knew I'd have something special after finding out who the cinematographer and soundtrack person was for this film. After that I watched Jay Lee's 2011 U.S. horror film Alyce Kills starring Jade Dornfeld and Eddie Rouse, about the titular Alcye who has a breakdown/downward spiral after accidentally pushing her friend off a building while both drunk and high. The acting, cinematography, gore, acts of violence, and soundtrack are all great. I thought Jade Dornfeld excelled as Alyce and liked how she went from this sort of sweet girl into this unrelenting badass who just decides to get back at everyone she feels has wronged her. I loved the chaotic randomness of the combat scenes and loved the cleaning scenes where it shows just how hard it would be to get rid of a body with household items especially with no clue how to do it. It's great how at the end she nonchalantly tells everyone what she's doing ,but they're too self absorbed to believe her. There's also quite a lot dark comedy throughout the film that adds to it, but never overpowers what is still a very serious movie. I thought the depictions of druggies and douchebags was also quite realistic. Don't let the first third of the movie put you off (featuring the antics of the two aforementioned demographics) this is a great movie and a recommend. I first became interested in this movie when I saw a quick review and poster of it on the same website that I learned about Jug Face from while searching for indie horror films. Finally I watched Francis Ford Coppola's 2011 American horror film Twixt starring Val Kilmer and Bruce Dern. It's about an author who goes to a small town and become embroiled in a local mystery. The acting in this film is awful-ok, the soundtrack is ok-good, a lot of the cinematography is great, the gore was awful (CGI) or great (practical), the acts of violence were ok. The thing is this movie used bad CGI... a lot for such unnecessary things such as a candlestick, knife, a tablecloth, fire, wine, etc. On top of that the acting is pretty bad and the movies is almost nonsensical. However, there are a few funny moments such as when the protagonist played by Val Kilmer is suffering writers block and proceeds to get progressively more intoxicated unable to even decide on one opening line. This movie was really bad and sad, I mean Francis Ford Coppola what happened man you made The Godfather films and Apocalypse Now. I was intrigued by a combination of this movie's poster and the fact that it was a horror film by Francis Ford Coppola which had me excited, but I ended up disappointed. JAS-8
|
|
|
Post by jakeawesomesnake on Apr 22, 2014 1:45:54 GMT -5
My god that was an over thirty minute ordeal just to post 4 movie posters. I even made sure I could do it before this competition and then I forgot how to, but in the end I was able to succeed. I feel so triumphant right now.
|
|
|
Post by jakeawesomesnake on Apr 25, 2014 16:25:41 GMT -5
First I watched a film that quite honestly I decided to watch based on two things: it had an awesome poster and I just couldn't resist a horror movie about a murderous Paul Bunyan. Anyway, I watched Gary Jones' 2013 U.S. horror film Axe Giant: The Wrath of Paul Bunyan (starring Dan Haggerty of Elves and Grizzly Adams fame), about a gigantic Paul Bunyan who decides to go on a rampage after his blue ox Babe's corpse is desecrated. The acting in this movie was bad-ok, the gore was awful CGI, the acts of violence looked awful, the soundtrack was ok, and the cinematography was good-great, and the special effects for a gigantic Paul Bunyan (which switched between CGI and suit) and his blue ox Babe (which was laughably awful CGI). What saves this movie is that the combination of bad CGI and Paul Bunyan's overdramatic acting which made the movie sort of funny. Overall, it was a bad movie that managed to be a little fun. This is one of those movies where the ludicrousness of the idea has me amused that there’s even a horror movie about it. Then I watched a film I'd been meaning to watch for about four previous competitions ,but was unable to do so. I'd been wanting to see this film ever since seeing its cover and was a little more intrigued when I found out it was a Jeff Lieberman film (a small horror director who's other films Blue Sunshine, Squirm, Satan's Little Helper I've all enjoyed on some level; 1981 U.S. slasher Just Before Dawn about a group of friends who decide to go camping and start disappearing one by one. The acting was good, the cinematography was good-great (in particular there were some real good shots of both the sunrise and sunset) (I was surprised at how there was none of that 80's horror film darkness), the gore was on the better side of ok, the acts of violence ranged from bad-good (mostly ok), the soundtrack was great (a combination of 80's synth, Heart of Glass by Blondie, and some funky rock). Additionally the killer(s) squeals, laughs, grunts, and growls all sounded great; sound effects are something you tend not to really notice unless they're bad or awful, but every now and then they excel as is the case here. The climax near the end was funny: the killer puts the heroine in the dreaded reverse bear hug, then switches to a normal bear hug, but she counters him with a freaking mandible claw of all things (all the whilst her dying boyfriend watches). Overall this was a good, fun movie. After that I watched a film I'd been wanting to watch since I was a little child because of its awesome poster, it took me a little while to find out what the movie actually was ,but I was finally able to find it; Joy N. Houck Jr.'s 1976 U.S. horror film Creature from Black Lake about a couple of anthropology students from Chicago who go down to Louisiana to search for bigfoot. The cinematography is either ok or great (mostly the prior), the soundtrack ranges from bad (that hokey horror music I've gone on about at length) to ok (the 70's rock) to good (the country songs), the gore is great, the acting is mostly ok (including the two main characters),but some of the side characters such as the local sheriff and the local crazy trapper were good, and the creature looked awful. One of the things the film also had going for it though was its unintentional comedy; such as 1 characters hatred of chicken as food, one person refusing to talk about what's meant to be a traumatic event ,but changing his tune as soon as he's offered $25, etc. Overall this was a bad ,but fun film. Finally I watched a film I'd been meaning to watch since our original Halloween competition, a film that I'd also been meaning to watch the past two competitions. I was originally interested in it because of its poster ,but then during our monster competition while I was looking up some zombie movies I saw it mentioned a couple of times which magnified my interest in it; Jorge Grau's British-Italian-Spanish 1974 horror film Let Sleeping Corpses Lie starring Ray Lovelock and Cristina Galbo. Its about the dead coming back due to ultrasonic radiation in a small English town. The acting, soundtrack (ominous rock), cinematography (seriously it is great similar to Images), acts of violence, gore , and evil eye effects all look great. It's different from other zombie films in that the only way to put down the undead is through immolation. I liked how 70's the film was: you have the prejudiced older police sergeant who clashes with the younger main character (who himself is quite annoyed he's in his situation since he went to the country for some peace and quite in the first place). This is a great movie and a recommend, it really exceeded all expectations. Besides some horror movies I'd randomly encountered here are two websites I used to find a lot of the films I've watched ang going to be watching for this competition. 80shorrormovies.com/index.htm and 80shorrormovies.com/index.htm . I used these sights for a dual purpose: to find and complete this one horror movie I've been trying to find for the greater part of a decade and to find some random horror movies to watch that I thought had some cool posters or sounded interesting. In particular I liked the random movie function on the prior site and have decided to eventually just brute force all the films on the latter site. JAS-16
|
|
|
Post by jakeawesomesnake on Apr 27, 2014 17:03:22 GMT -5
From now on all of the horror movies I watch are pretty much just going to be an onslaught of random movies I thought had awesome posters.
|
|
|
Post by jakeawesomesnake on May 1, 2014 11:52:44 GMT -5
First I watched Francesco Barilli's 1974 Italian horror film The Perfume of the Lady in Black starring Mimsy Farmer, about a woman with a traumatic childhood who begins to wonder if she's going mad or if something more sinister is after her. The acting was bad-good, the dubbing was awful (as I've unfortunately come to expect of older Italian horror films), the soundtrack was great (a mix of rock, strings, and the prior two mixed together), there was some great cinematography, the gore ranged from ok-great (mostly good, although the severed finger looked pretty bad), and the acts of violence ranged from ok-good. Like a lot of Italian horror films it managed to be sexually menacing through a man who the protagonist's mother had had an affair with when she was younger. That guy had a serious, menacing presence on him and was involved in really brutal attempted rape scene, the only thing that took away from that scene was the weak looking hit that ended it. While I thought the twist looked cool it didn't really make sense and seemed sort of forced into the movie even though it actually had a surprisingly good storyline. Overall it sort of evens out into an ok movie. The next film I watched has a semi-convoluted story as to why I watched it. Originally I randomly saw a poster for a film called Zombie Flesh Eaters which I thought had an awesome poster (pictured below), then after doing some spoiler free research I realized it was a horror film with a strong reputation which I'd been meaning to get around to; Lucio Fulci's 1979 Italian horror film Zombi 2. It's about a duo that finds themselves trapped in a zombie invasion in a Caribbean island, while investigating a man's death and stars Tisa Farrow (Mia Farrow's younger sister). The acting is great (there is some dubbing hiccups every now and then ,but for the most part everything actually matches up; contrary to what I've come to expect from Italian films... particularly horror), the soundtrack is great (a combination of excellent synth, rock, Caribbean music, and tribal drumming), the cinematography is great (similar to Images and Let Sleeping Corpses Lie every shot is a work of art), the gore is great, the acts of violence look great, and the zombie's looked good as well. I liked how the doctor was experiencing heavy cognitive dissonance because as a man of science he doesn't believe in magical voodoo, but yet he can't deny that the dead are reanimating. The eyeball scene and shark-zombie fight scene were both awesome. In particular the latter works on a few different levels. It starts out comically with the diver having a one piece swimming suit, swimming cap, and diving gear. Then you have the zombie attack the first moving thing it sees a shark and it viciously goes after it hooking it's gills with its fingers and taking a chunk out of it ,but the shark decides to not go gently and comes back with a vengeance. Meanwhile, the gore being created from this madness looks even more vicious in water. Similarly to The Long Good Friday (another great 1979 film) the synth soundtrack would make you believe it’s an 80’s film, just shows you how similar the border years of decades can be. This was a great movie that lived up to its reputation and a recommend (although I believe you have already seen it LOB). After that I watched a film I was vaguely aware of that I wasn't expecting to be too good; J. Lee Thompson's 1981 Canadian slasher Happy Birthday to Me starring Melissa Sue Anderson and Glenn Ford. It's about a girl name Virginia who's friend disappear while her memories start to come back in the week leading up to her birthday. The cinematography was great, the soundtrack was mostly great (a combination of disco, rock, synth, lullaby, and traditional horror strings music), the gore was great, the acts of violence looked great, and the acting was great (particularly the two aforementioned actors). The only thing that was bad was the weird lighting bolt coming out of the science teachers finger (supposedly static electricity), that was weird man it was like a standalone Family Guy gag in what's otherwise a pretty serious movie. The movie had some giallo elements; utilizing both numerous red herrings and a killer who's seen primarily through their leather gloves, the things is though almost everyone has leather gloves at some point. I thought the car stunts looked great and that the film also had a nice variety of kills. I originally saw the first poster below, but while looking for it to post here I saw the original poster which I also thought looked good. Finally I watched a film that I wasn't so much interested in because of its poster, it was more the title on the poster that made me want to see the movie; both directed and written by the same duo Rick Popko and Dan West's 2003 American horror-comedy... Monsturd. Its about an escaped convict who escapes into a sewer where toxic waste has been dumped thus creating the titular creature. The actin is awful, the soundtrack is either awful (over the top horror jazz or strings) or great (an eclectic set of jazz, syth, rock, country, blues, and traditional horror strings), the cinematography is bad-ok, the gore is ok-good, the acts of violence look awful, and the other special effects (Monsturd, the million CGI flies, and a zoom up of a fly done with practical effects) all look awful. The movie's real strength however is comedy. There's all the purposeful clichés such as: the alcoholic sheriff recovering from his wife's death, the evil scientist, the town deciding not to abandon some festival in spite of the danger because of its economy relying on said festival, the female federal agent (Silence of the Lambs style), etc. Additionally there's also: non-stop puns, a hilarious reference to D.A.R.E. involving Donny the Doper (a hippy puppet where the cop gets too much into character and starts both arguing and beating with said puppet; quite honestly it's the best acting of the film), the cops eating donuts almost every scene there in, the diaper body armor, and purposely over the top sound effects. This was a bad yet entertaining film, I quite enjoyed it. JAS-24
|
|
|
Post by jakeawesomesnake on May 9, 2014 9:36:37 GMT -5
This particular set of films were all films I watched with someone else ,except for the lone horror film. First I watched a film that I was originally interested in seeing after watching a preview clip of it on The Daily Show, however I decided to watch it simply because I thought the poster looked cool and realized about a third of the way through it was the movie clip I'd seen; Fisher Stevens 2012 American dramedy Stand Up Guys starring Christopher Walken, Al Pacino, and Alan Arkin. Its about a trio of retired gangsters getting back together after one finally gets out from a long stint in prison. The acting, soundtrack (a variety of rock styles), cinematography, acts of violence, gore, and dialogue was all great. It sort of remembered me of a more updated and more violent version of Going Out in Style another great film from the 70's). The driving scenes were awesome (that was a seriously cool car) and I liked how they sort of decided to make things right throughout their day back together. This is a great movie, that manages to bet sad, funny, and touching.. a recommend. Then I watched a film I'd been meaning to watch for awhile, which also happened to have a good cover; Ridley Scott's 1991 American film Thelma & Louise starring Susan Sarandon, Greena Davis, Michael Madsen, Harvey Keitel, and Brad Pitt. Its about the titular duo's trip that quickly goes out of hand. The acting, soundtrack (a mix of country and rock), cinematography, gore, acts of violence, and dialogue were all great. The rapist was threatening and the scene where he gets killed was awesome, if they'd have just killed him initially and reported it they'd have been fine (that sort of thing happens a lot though). I liked Keitel as the cop sympathetic to the titular duo who realized they'd been dealt bad hands numerous times throughout their lives, Thelma's husband (Christpher McDonald) was an incredibly realistic depictions of the types of assholes I've had experiences with, I mean it was dead on. On top of that the movie managed to be both funny and sad at the same time. The truck exploding sort of bugged me ,but it was funny. This was a great movie and a recommend (although I'm sure you've probably seen it). Also I did some checking and found out parts of this movie were filmed in my town. After that I watched a film I'd been meaning to watch for awhile because of its reputation and it having a good poster; Nobuo Nakagawa's 1960 Japanese horror film Jigoku (literally Japanese for Hell and also spread under the title The Sinners of Hell), its about a theology student who becomes involved in a traffic incident and then undergoes the tribulations of hell. The acting ranges from bad-great, the gore is great, the acts of violence look bad, the cinematography is great, and the soundtrack ranges from awful (this ghost sounding whine) to great (jazz and traditional Japanese music). The movie shows various depictions of hell and many look quite good, for example the ice spike pit and the river of blood, there's also images of demons with clubs that looked great. At the same time the King of Hell looks laughably bad. The ending (while looking gorgeous) also had me wondering what had just happened. I watched some of the special features for the film and ended up liking it a little better (it's usually sort of harder to dislike a film when you have some insight into the process of making it). Interestingly this is definitely a splatter film predating HGL's 1963 Blood Feast by three years and continuing a trend I've noticed of 60's Japanese films having better looking gore than many of their western counterparts being made around the same time (although they tend to be incoherent and the acts of violence themselves tend to look pretty bad ,although considering the environment of that times it's hard to blame the filmmakers). Finally I watched a film who's poster had intrigued me while I'd scowered Netflix's instant stream various times before finally deciding to watch it (having foolishly been dissuaded by its PG-13 rating); Kim Chapirion's 2010 Canadian film Dog pound, about a group of teens at a violent juvenile prison. The acting, soundtrack, dialogue, gore, acts of violence, and cinematography are all great. This movie doesn't mess around, it is intense. I thought the interactions between prisoners were realistic and liked all improvised weaponry used in the film (such as a coffee mug and ping pong paddle). The riot scene near the end of the film was great, just so damn chaotic and the film's finale was appropriately brutal and unrelenting... they use batons exactly the way you're meant to (on your arms and legs) and the results look fantastic. I was surprised at how great this film is, I still don't know how it got it's PG-13 rating (there's brutal rape and violence of all kinds), and it is a recommend. Just goes to show you that you shouldn't judge a movie just because of its rating. JAS- 30
|
|
|
Post by jakeawesomesnake on May 14, 2014 8:02:31 GMT -5
First I finally watched a film that not only penetrated deep into popular culture ,but is also considered a great movie, which happens to have a great poster; Quentin Tarentino's 1994 American anthology film Pulp Fiction starring John Travolta, Bruce Willis, Samuel L. Jackson, Uma Thurman, and Harvey Keitel. The acting, soundtrack (so many great older songs such as Misirlou, Jungle Boogie, and Son of a Preacher Man just to name a few), cinematography, gore, acts of violence, and dialogue (as is to be expected of a Tarentino film) is all great. This movie is both funny and intense. Julian and Vince Vega are an awesome duo, sadly for Vega he forgot that you always keep your weapon on you. I'd always been under the impression that this film would be harder to piece together because of it's non-chronological sequencing ,but it was easy to follow and all made sense at the end (something I like in movies). It also points out that just because you have a hand cannon doesn't mean that the bullets are going to magically hit their mark. There's just so much great stuff in this movie, what a great film. Then I watched David E. Durston's 1970 American horror film I Drink Your Blood about a group of Satanist hippies who come to a small town and begin to wreak havoc. The acting is awful-ok, the gore is awful-great (mostly bad or ok), the acts of violence look bad, the cinematography is mostly ok ,but has a few great shots. The soundtrack (some rock music) is good. One of the things I found funny about this movie was how the band of Satanists was made up of a somewhat culturally diverse group: you've got a redneck, some hippy women, a black guy, an Asian woman, and an incredibly over the top Hispanic cult leader. I liked the scene where the grandpa goes to confront the cult and ends up beaten and drugged because at first he acts smartly by bringing a weapon with him (a double barrel shotgun), but he forgets one of the most important rule of weapons: don't have it and especially don't bring it out if you aren't willing to use it. I liked how the kid character (awfully acted by the way) is actually somewhat smart in the film: he kicks the cult leader in the groin when he tries to grab him and actually gets a weapon (a big stick) while running away. He's also such a bizarre character, because he's mad at the cult he poisons there meat pies with rabid dog blood and it's never treated like a weird thing. The movie truly shines during the climatic fight scene between the Hispanic cult leader and his black disciple. I mean my god it is hilarious with all the random halfhearted strikes, random rolling around on the ground, and a surprisingly brutal conclusion. It also apparently made some history as the first American film to be rated X on violence (and not sexual content) alone. This is a bad, but entertaining movie After that I watched a film with a quite awful film poster (which seems to be the main one used. However, when I found it it had an awesome illustrated poster which will be pictured below. Jerry Ciccoritti's 1987 Canadian horror film Central Park Drifter aka Graveyard Shift (apparently it was originally titled the latter, but its name was changed to the prior on home video release. It's about a vampiric taxi cab driver who's grown weary of life and falls in love with a terminally ill music video director. This movie was kind of all over the place quality wise. The acting ranged from awful-good, the cinematography from ok-great, the soundtrack (made up of both 80's synth and synth-rock) was great, the acts of violence ranged from awful-good, and the gore ranged from awful-great. The robbers for example were awfully acted throughout, but the main characters started out acted well enough and ended up pretty bad. For example the terminally ill heroine had this scene where she runs away ridiculously and then her acting fell to the same level as that run. The thing is despite the awful execution through the majority of the film, I still thought it had some good ideas concerning vampires. For example, the protagonist has been around quite awhile and as a result has made a lot of vampiresses. However, he doesn't turn any of them until they are right on death's door so that they can live out their life naturally for as long as possible and can choose whether or not they want to. Also, while I've seen vampire fiction where the host vampire can make ghouls or full vampires and if they're killed then the resulting spawn are killed. In this film if any of the spawn are hurt or killed then the host is as well. Finally, I liked how all the vampires had late night jobs ,therefore the original title Graveyard Shift, (taxi driver, stripper, police officer, etc.) serving the triple purpose of monetary sustainment, self-preservation from the sun, and avid opportunity for "nourishment". Also the husband character is a douchebag who cheats on his terminally ill wife, but gets angry when she reciprocates. Additionally the opening was unintentionally hilarious as you have a synth stinger every time a new group of text comes up. Overall this was a bad horror film that managed to be somewhat entertaining (albeit of the unintentional kind)and had some good ideas that were badly executed. Finally I watched a film that's considered a counterculture classic (that happens to have an awesome poster); Dennis Hopper's 1969 American film Easy Rider starring Dennis Hopper, Peter Fonda, and Jack Nicholson about a pair of drug running bikers going across America. The acting, cinematography, dialogue, soundtrack (an almost nonstop onslaught of great 60's rock), acts of violence, and gore all looked great. On top of that the film has another thing going for it (something that Neal and Annabelle and numerous others have discussed at length. The people actually look like people and not everyone looks like a model. After all, the movie used a lot of people who weren't actors essentially just told to play themselves. I thought the dialogue was realistic, I've seen plenty of people like that (the locals in the restaurant) who still speak and feel like that today. The acid trip scene was just amazing and intense (the cinematography, coupled with he music, and Peter Fonda losing it while talking to a statue like it was his mom who died when he was ten)combined with his line afterwards to his friend that we blew it was so poignant. Not only had they sort of just let their friend die and not do anything about it (granted it probably would've been extremely difficult),but they made all that money and just blew it on alcohol, drugs, and prostitutes when they had a chance at something more permanent. The ending has that abrupt violence (and downer quality) similar to many late 60's and 70's films in general. Great movie and a recommend. JAS-35
|
|
|
Post by jakeawesomesnake on Jun 1, 2014 4:28:52 GMT -5
Well I appear to have one, I leave the next competition to you LOB.
|
|
|
Post by loverofbeers on Sept 9, 2014 15:12:00 GMT -5
Well, I will first like to apologize to the great JAS twice, once here, and in a separate thread more fully.
During this competition oh so many months ago I watched only three movies and latye tonight I will post the movie posters and my thoughts on all three flicks, but they were the new Captain America movie, Thor The Dark World, and The Purge, for a total of a sad four points. Starting a new threrad in a moment to Jake. Cheers!, you badass!
LOB-4
|
|