|
Post by Loser-Boy 2049 on Jul 18, 2008 8:22:22 GMT -5
So I don't know why I bothered but I read Rottentomatoes today to see what critics who hated "The Dark Knight" felt about the movie. I noticed the first review that was "rotten" was from a guy that was listed as "internet reviewer". I clicked on his review and it said “read his blog”. So it appears he doesn’t work for any credible place and is just a blogger.
How is his opinion valid enough to make a meter of some of the best, and most famous, critics out there? I just don’t get it. It’s starting to make me think RT isn’t as reliable as it seems.
|
|
|
Post by wulf on Jul 18, 2008 12:16:56 GMT -5
I don't know that working for a "credible" agency necessarily makes someone's opinion any more valid either. Did you read his review? Movies are such a subjective topic that I usually only even read a review for the entertainment value, I would more highly value a movie review written here by people who share common interests than one written by a supposedly "best and most famous" critic.
|
|